Parasitoid wasps are good for examining the ecological and evolutionary patterns that spring from close interspecific interaction. Currently we are studying the phylogenetic pattern of cryptic (sibling) species. That is, groups of closely related species that do not interbreed, but are morphologically and ecologically very similar. Based on molecular and morphological phylogenetic analysis as well as behavioral studies, we have found about 15 species of Cotesia parasitoids exclusively using the checkerspot butterfly genera Melitaea and Euphydryas in Eurasia and North America. Most of the Cotesia fall into two cryptic species groups.
Kankare, M., Stefanescu, C., van Nouhuys, S., Shaw, M. R. 2005. Host specialization by Cotesia wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) parasitising species-rich Melitaeini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) communities in north-eastern Spain. The Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society, 86: 45-65 PDF
Kankare, M., van Nouhuys, S. Hanski, I. 2005. Genetic divergence among host-specific cryptic species in Cotesia melitaearum agg., a parasitoid of checkerspot butterflies. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 98: 382-394 PDF
| Two
radiations of Cotesia on checkerspot hosts
|
|
Mechanisms
of co-existence
Two very similar species cannot share a limiting resource, which may explain
why we have found no examples of Cotesia from a single cryptic
species group using the same host butterfly species. However, there are
three examples of
two Cotesia species from different cryptic species groups sharing
a host butterfly (3 butterfly species out of 18), even in the same locale.
This leads us to
ask what allows their coexistence. We are conducting laboratory competition
experiments using two contrasting species pairs. Their coexistence can
differ if the wasps differ in immature aggression,
phenology, voltinism, host immune
response,
and control
of host phenology. Additionally, each of the two Cotesia groups
is primarily associated with host butterflies feeding on plants with slightly
different
chemical defense. We will test the hypothesis, using laboratory experiments,
that each group is better adapted to hosts sequestering one or the other
class of plant defensive chemicals